A Proposal for Departmentalizing Ethnic Studies at the University of Oregon

October 14, 2007 (Revised April 24, 2008)

 

I. A Vision for the Future: Diversity, Excellence, and Stability

 

Conversion of the Ethnic Studies Program (ES) at the University of Oregon to a Department of Ethnic Studies will help the University to remain at the head of the curve for top public universities.  It will invigorate the UniversityÕs diversity plan with no financial impact.  After considering the advantages of departmentalization, support among faculty and students, the financial impact, the logistics of small departments in the UniversityÕs College of Arts & Sciences (CAS), and the national and regional trends among comparable members of the Association of American Universities (AAU), there exist no compelling reasons to delay this conversion beyond the 2007-08 academic year.

 

Renaming its Ethnic Studies Program to ÒThe Department of Ethnic StudiesÓ would put the University of Oregon among leading public universities nationally, although it would only be catching up with leading public institutions regionally.  On the University level, departmentalization would not represent a radical policy departure or change in direction.  To the contrary, it would entail a continuation of the policy course charted by Dean Stone in spring of 2006.  Waiting for a new Dean to be in place would only result in unnecessary delay given the minimal changes departmentalization would lead to with regard to the functioning of ES, CAS, and the University.

 

One common concern regarding ES departmentalization has been the new departmentÕs ability to fulfill all of the normal functions of a department.  The Program, however, already performs all of the functions of a department, including coordinating degree programs and conducting tenure-related searches (both joint appointments and appointments funded 100% in the Program).  Furthermore, once the Program has filled its remaining vacant tenure-related line, its governing faculty will be comparable to many other CAS departments.  Due to the size of the ES faculty, one of the conditions for departmentalization laid down by Dean Stone was the conversion of the Executive Committee to a core faculty.  One should note, however, that the ES Executive Committee has functioned identically to an expanded core faculty (with full voting rights and full participation on personnel committees) for nearly a decade.  Thus, although the new configuration of the Core Faculty is relatively new, we have considerable experience with the general practices entailed by it.

 

Given the implementation of the UniversityÕs Diversity Plan, the departmentalization of Ethnic Studies is timely.  Ethnic Studies has served a crucial role in educating students of color and international students in CAS and has proven to be one of the most effective mechanisms for diversifying the CAS faculty.  In addition, student support for departmentalization has remained constant since the inception of ES as a program, and it shows signs of increasing.

 

 

 

 

II. In Pursuit of Excellence: Trends in Ethnic Studies at Comparator Institutions

Nearly all AAU universities have departments, programs, institutes, or centers with curricular components in ES-related fields (Appendix I).  Of the 60 AAU universities in the United States, 26 (43%) have ethnic studies or ethnic studies-related units with departmental status.  Seven of these offer doctoral degrees in Ethnic Studies (UC Berkeley, UC San Diego, USC), African American Studies (Harvard and Northwestern), Chicana/o Studies (UC Santa Barbara), or Native American Studies (UC Davis).

 

The percentage of AAU universities with ES-related departments increases significantly, however, for those most similar to the University of Oregon (Appendix I).  For example, while only 27% of AAU private universities in the United States have ES or ES-related departments, 56% of AAU publics do.  There are ES-related departments at eight out of the ten AAU public universities in the western states, and the University of Oregon is alone among AAU public institutions on the West Coast in not having any ES-related department.

 

Beyond the AAU universities, many public universities on the west coast with which the University of Oregon may compete for students have ES-related departments (Appendix II): Oregon State University, the University of California, Riverside, the University of Hawaii, Washington State University, Humboldt State University, San Francisco State University, San Diego State University, and California Polytechnic University.  The following California State Universities also have ES-related departments: East Bay, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Northridge, and Sacramento.

 

Among AAU public universities, regional patterns are significant.  In the West, one most often finds a single department that brings together the study of multiple ethnic groups (UC Berkeley, UC Davis, UC San Diego, Colorado, Washington).[1]  Almost as often, one finds several departments focusing on the study of individual ethnic groups in the United States, typically Chicano/Latino, Asian American, and/or African American or Black Studies (UC Irvine, UC Los Angeles, UC Santa Barbara).

 

In the East and Midwest, however, Departments of Africana or African & African American Studies predominate (Indiana, Rutgers, Stony Brook, Kansas, North Carolina, Pittsburgh).  To a lesser extent, one also finds departments focusing exclusively on African American Studies (Buffalo, Maryland, Ohio State, Wisconsin) and Asian American Studies (Stony Brook).  At all of these types of campuses, additional ethnic studies fields are typically studied in separate interdisciplinary programs or within American studies departments or area studies programs.  The University of Minnesota is anomalous as an AAU public university outside the West in that it has three separate departments of African American and African Studies, American Indian Studies, and Chicano Studies.

 

The University of Oregon would become the fifth AAU university to specifically have a Department of Ethnic Studies.  It would join many others, however, especially public universities in the West, in departmentalizing some aspect of the field.  ES faculty members at the University of Oregon continue to believe that the comparative ethnic model that exists at UC Berkeley, Colorado, Washington, and UC San Diego is the best one for a west coast public university.

 

A Department of Ethnic Studies at the U of O, with six tenure-related faculty members, would be the smallest multi-ethnicity department among AAU universities (Appendix III).  However, the new governance model adopted by ES would allow it to function with an effective faculty size closer to the AAU average of 12.75.  This model is obviously not as ideal as a faculty comprised entirely of dedicated lines.  For this reason, we hope that, should additional resources become available to the University in the future, it would invest in expanding Ethnic Studies on par with other AAU west coast public universities.  However, we do not see our request for departmentalization as dependent on an increased faculty size.

 

 

III. Local Context: Small Departments in the College of Arts & Sciences

 

In Fall 2008, the Ethnic Studies Program will have five faculty members with permanent FTEs in Ethnic Studies: four assistant professors (Daniel HoSang, Brian Klopotek, Ernesto Mart’nez, and Irmary Reyes-Santos), one associate professor (Michael Hames-Garc’a), and no full professors.  It is continuing a tenure-related search in 2008-2009 for an assistant- or associate-level professor, which should bring this number to six.  Of these six positions, only two (HoSang and Mart’nez) are joint appointments.  In addition, the Program currently has five Òcore facultyÓ members appointed from outside ES, three of whom are associate professors (Shari Huhndorf, Peggy Pascoe, and Jiannbin Shiao) and two of whom are full professors (Jeffrey Ostler and Lynn Stephen).  (Shiao is leaving at the end of 2007-2008.)  Under our governance structure, this means that its core faculty should total nine members beginning in fall 2008: four assistant professors, three associate professors, and two full professors.  Furthermore, ES has 29 additional affiliated faculty members.  Were it to departmentalize and fill its vacant line, its core governing faculty would be the seventh smallest among CAS departments, tied with Philosophy (Appendix IV).  Its number of full-time, tenure-track faculty involved in departmental governance would be larger than that of the departments of Classics, Theatre Arts, Human Physiology, Religious Studies, Linguistics, and German and Scandinavian.  Of course, the nature of core faculty appointments means that members not hired in ES will inevitably divide some of their service commitments with home departments and likely not contribute student credit hours (SCH) to ES.

 

Given the comparable size of the ES core faculty to other small departments in CAS and the stability and high levels of commitment among the core faculty that have evolved over the past decade, it is difficult to imagine objections based on the logistics of performing the day-to-day tasks within an academic department.

 

In terms of teaching, however, the number of faculty members contributing SCH to the department will be lower than nearly all other CAS departments.  In this regard, comparisons with Classics and Theatre Arts are particularly noteworthy.  Classics has four regular faculty members (fewer than ES), but three additional core members.  As with ES, these additional core members participate in governance but do not teach courses for the Department.  Theatre Arts has five regular faculty members, as well as two instructors, but no additional core faculty members.  Both Classics and Theatre Arts conduct hiring, promotion, and tenure processes without significant involvement of faculty members outside their core faculties.

 

Another noteworthy comparison is with the Program in Comparative Literature.  COLT currently has one joint appointment (assistant) and one full appointment (associate).  It has just filled another position, a full appointment for Fall 2008.  It also has six tenured faculty members (including its director) who are the equivalent of ES core faculty.  By comparison, ES is searching next year for its fourth full appointments (its sixth faculty member in the Program).  It will have four additional tenured core faculty members next fall.  The lack of structural parity between small programs like COLT and Creative Writing (five fully-appointed faculty members and an external director), which do not have to cede tenure decisions to other departments, and the larger ES program, which is not allowed to handle its own personnel decisions, is striking and difficult to justify.

 

 

IV. Financial Impact of Departmentalization

 

Although a frequently expressed concern is that departmentalization cannot take place because of insufficient resources, no one at the University of Oregon to date has proposed any significant direct or indirect cost resulting from departmentalization.  The resources for faculty lines and classified staff have already been committed.  There should therefore be no direct financial impact to CAS resulting from the departmentalization of Ethnic Studies.  ES will need to reprint business cards and other publicity materials, but this can be accomplished out of existing ES accounts.  Electronic and print materials for the University can be revised during the normal course of updating.  Tenure-home departments all support the ceding of personnel decisions to the program and there is no indication that these departments would need compensation for the reversion of SCH back to ES, since the courses currently taught for tenure-home departments has been conceived of as compensation for the handling of personnel cases.

 

Although the new governmental structure of ES has just been elaborated, the Program has been functioning with a virtually identical governance model for nearly a decade.  We therefore anticipate no immediate direct financial costs from the new governance model.

 

We do anticipate that expansion of ES would be a priority for the University, should additional resources become available in the future.  This is due in part to the size of ES at the University of Oregon relative to Ethnic Studies Departments at other AAU public universities.  In addition, expansion of Ethnic Studies has been and should continue to be one of the most effective means for promoting diversity among students and faculty at the University.  To repeat, however, we do not see departmentalization as contingent upon new resources.

 


V. Consequences of Departmentalization for Tenure-Related Faculty

One of the reasons for pursuing departmental status for ES lies in the peculiarities of its tenure-related appointments.  Slightly different procedures around tenure and promotion govern each member of the Program, with two significant consequences.  Firstly, and most importantly, outside units effectively make hiring, tenure, and promotion decisions for the Program (even when they are not represented on hiring committees).  Secondly, faculty members ÒoweÓ teaching to their tenure homes.  While the faculty members sometimes welcome the opportunity to teach courses in traditional disciplines, the Program receives no other compensation for the lost SCH taught by faculty members whose salary and OPE is paid 100% by ES.  This amounts to an annual ÒtaxÓ on SCH from ES to other departments.  This situation is especially burdensome given the small size of our teaching faculty.  In return, the Program must cede intellectual autonomy, as if it were incapable of independently determining scholarly quality.  These consequences have had a deleterious effect on morale, influencing the eventual decisions of Jayna Brown and Adria Imada to leave the UO.  They have also sometimes affected the ProgramÕs ability to successfully hire and recruit the best faculty in the field of ethnic studies.

 

It should be reiterated that not all programs are required to cede such autonomy.  Comparative Literature, with fewer regular faculty members, has tenure and hiring autonomy.  Furthermore, small departments like Theatre Arts, Classics, Human Physiology, and Religious Studies are not required to cede decision-making authority in personnel cases to outside departments.

 

For these reasons, regardless of the decision over departmentalization, we request that individual faculty members with full or partial FTEs in ES be allowed to renegotiate the terms of their hiring contracts so as to move the decision for tenure and promotion in part or in full to ES.  Initiation of such a renegotiation will be strictly voluntary and any new agreement will require the approval of all units involved (including the Director or Head of ES, the Dean, and the original or continuing tenure home).  In the event that a faculty member does not choose to change the terms of her or his contract or should all parties be unable to agree on the proposed changes, the original hiring documents will remain in effect.

 

For future hires, ES should be treated equally to other departments and programs that have the full capacity to tenure and promote.

 


Appendix I: AAU Universities and Ethnic Studies-Related Departments

 


AAU Private Universities

 

Brandeis University*

Brown University*

California Institute of Technology

Carnegie Mellon University

Case Western Reserve University

Columbia University

Cornell University

Duke University

Emory University**

Harvard University*

The Johns Hopkins University

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

New York University

Northwestern University**

Princeton University

Rice University

Stanford University

Syracuse University**

Tulane University

The University of Chicago

University of Pennsylvania

University of Rochester

University of Southern California****

Vanderbilt University

Washington University in St. Louis

Yale University

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Dept. combining African and African American Studies

**One or more separate ES-related depts.

***Dept. in Ethnic Studies

****Dept. in American Studies & Ethnicity

Italicized universities have ES-related departments that offer an M.A. and/or Ph.D.


AAU Public Universities[2]

 

Indiana University*

Iowa State University

Michigan State University

The Ohio State University*

The Pennsylvania State University

Purdue University

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey*

Stony Brook University-State University of New York*

Texas A&M University

The University of Arizona

University at Buffalo, The State University of New York**

University of California, Berkeley***

University of California, Davis**

University of California, Irvine**

University of California, Los Angeles**

University of California, San Diego***

University of California, Santa Barbara**

University of Colorado at Boulder***

University of Florida

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

University of Iowa

The University of Kansas*

University of Maryland at College Park**

University of Michigan

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities**

University of Missouri-Columbia

University of Nebraska-Lincoln

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill*

University of Oregon

University of Pittsburgh*

The University of Texas at Austin

University of Virginia

University of Washington***

The University of Wisconsin-Madison**

 

 

 


Appendix II: Selected Non-AAU Universities with ES-Related Departments

 


Bowling Green State University

Department of Ethnic Studies

7 tenure-related faculty members

 

California Polytechnic State University

Ethnic Studies Department

5 tenure-related faculty members

 

California State University, East Bay

Department of Ethnic Studies

5 tenure-related faculty members

 

California State University, Los Angeles

Department of Chicano Studies

7 tenure-related faculty members

 

California State University, Northridge

Department of Chicana and Chicano Studies

30 tenure-related faculty members

 

California State University, Sacramento

Ethnic Studies Department

18 tenure-related faculty members

 

Humboldt State University

Department of Ethnic Studies

3 tenure-related faculty members

 

Minnesota State University-Mankato

Department of Ethnic Studies

6 tenure-related faculty members

 


Oregon State University

Department of Ethnic Studies

6 tenure-related faculty members

 

San Diego State University

Department of Chicana & Chicano Studies

10 tenure-related faculty members

 

San Francisco State University

College of Ethnic Studies

Asian American Studies Department

15 tenure-related faculty members

Department of Black Studies

13 tenure-related faculty members

Raza Studies Department

17 tenure-related faculty members

American Indian Studies Department

4 tenure-related faculty members

 

Temple University

Department of African American Studies

6 tenure-related faculty members

 

University of California, Riverside

Department of Ethnic Studies

13 tenure-related faculty members

 

University of Hawaii

Department of Ethnic Studies

10 tenure-related faculty members

 

Washington State University

Department of Comparative Ethnic Studies

8 tenure-track faculty members


 

 


Appendix III: AAU ES-Related Departments:

Type, Faculty Size, & Graduate Degrees

 


Ethnic Studies

University of California, Berkeley

Department of Ethnic Studies (Ph.D.)

16 tenure-related faculty members

University of California, San Diego

Department of Ethnic Studies (Ph.D.)

13 tenure-related faculty members

University of Washington

Department of American Ethnic Studies

12 tenure-related faculty members

University of Colorado at Boulder

Department of Ethnic Studies

10 tenure-related faculty members

 

 

African Diaspora Only

Harvard University

Dept. of African & Af. Amer. St  (Ph.D.)

20 tenure-related faculty members

Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Dept. of African & Afro-American Studies

16 tenure-related faculty members

Brown University

Africana Studies Department

11 tenure-related faculty members

Indiana University

Dept. of Af. Am. & Af. Diaspora St (MA)

11 tenure-related faculty members

University of Kansas

Dept. of African & Af-American St (MA)

10 tenure-related faculty members

Rutgers, State University of New Jersey

Department of Africana Studies

9 tenure-related faculty members

University of Pittsburgh

Department of Africana Studies

7 tenure-related faculty members

Brandeis University

Dept. of African and Afro-American St

3 tenure-related faculty members

 

 

Joint American and Ethnic Studies

University of Southern California

Dept. of American St. & Ethnicity (Ph.D.)

23 tenure-related faculty members


Separate Ethnicity Studies

University of California, Los Angeles

Department of Chicana & Chicano Studies

Asian American Studies Dept. (M.A.)

35 tenure-related faculty members

Stony Brook University, SUNY

Africana Studies Department

Dept. of Asian and Asian American St

33 tenure-related faculty members

University of California, Santa Barbara

Department of Asian American Studies

Department of Black Studies

Dept. of Chicana & Chicano St (Ph.D.)

31 tenure-related faculty members

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

Dept. of African American & African St

Department of American Indian Studies

Department of Chicano Studies

24 tenure-related faculty members

Ohio State University

Department of African American Studies

21 tenure-related faculty members

Northwestern University

Dept. of African American Studies (Ph.D.)

15 tenure-related faculty members

University of California, Irvine

Department of Asian American Studies

Department of Chicano/Latino Studies

15 tenure-related faculty members

Syracuse University

Dept. of African American Studies (M.A.)

10 tenure-related faculty members

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Dept. of Afro-American Studies (M.A.)

9 tenure-related faculty members

University of California, Davis

Dept. of Native American Studies (Ph.D.)

8 tenure-related faculty members

Emory University

Department of African American Studies

7 tenure-related faculty members

University at Buffalo, SUNY

Department of African American Studies

7 tenure-related faculty members

University of Maryland, College Park

African American Studies Department

7 tenure-related faculty members


Appendix IV: Small Departments in CAS

 

*Note: Numbers do not necessarily account for vacant, but funded, faculty lines, including those for which searches are currently underway.  Because data are from departmental webpages, they might not be current.  Not included here are the two CAS programs that tenure their own faculty: Comparative Literature (one fully appointed associate professor, one jointly appointed assistant professor, and one fully appointed assistant professor arriving in fall 2008) and Creative Writing (two full professors, two associate professors, and one assistant professor).

 

Once it fills its vacant line, the Ethnic Studies Program (Social Sciences) will have 6 regular faculty members (4-5 asst, 1-2 assoc, 0 full).  In addition, the program will have 4 zero FTE, core faculty members.  ES has 29 affiliated faculty members.  Were it to departmentalize and fill its vacant line, its core faculty would be the seventh smallest among CAS departments (on par with Philosophy and just smaller than East Asian Languages and Literatures and Geography), with 10 members (4-5 asst, 3-4 assoc, 2 full).  Its number of full-time, tenure-track faculty members involved in departmental governance would be larger than that of Classics, Theatre Arts, Human Physiology, Religious Studies, Linguistics, or German and Scandinavian.

 


The Department of Classics (Humanities) has 4 regular faculty members (3 asst, 2 assoc, 0 full).  In addition, the department has 3 core faculty members (all full) with tenure homes outside Classics.  The department also has 1 instructor, 2 participating faculty members, and no affiliated faculty.  The department offers an MA.

 

The Department of Theatre Arts (Humanities) has 5 regular faculty members (2 asst, 1 assoc, 2 full).  In addition, the department has 1 senior instructor and 1 instructor.  The department does not have any affiliated or participating faculty members.  The department offers an MA, an MFA, and a PhD.

 

The Department of Human Physiology (Natural Sciences) has 6 regular faculty members (1 asst, 4 assoc, 1 full).  In addition, there is 1 senior instructor, an Exercise Physiology Coordinator, and a Program Director/Graduate Athletic Trainer.  The department does have any affiliated or participating faculty members.  It offers both an MS and a PhD.

 

The Department of Religious Studies (Humanities) has 7 regular faculty members (3 asst, 3 assoc, 1 full).  In addition, it has 17 affiliated faculty members.  The department does not offer a graduate degree.

 

The Department of Linguistics (Humanities) has 8 regular faculty members (2 asst, 3 assoc, 3 full).  In addition, it has 14 Òdepartmental colleagues and associates,Ó and 9 affiliated faculty.  The department offers both an MA and a PhD.

 

The Department of German and Scandinavian (Humanities) has 9 regular faculty members (2 asst, 4 assoc, 3 full).  In addition, it has 4 adjunct instructors, and no participating or affiliated faculty.  The department offers both an MA and a PhD.

 

The Department of Philosophy (Humanities) has 10 regular faculty members (4 asst, 3 assoc, 3 full).  In addition, it has 4 adjunct assistant professors, and 2 affiliated faculty.  The department offers both an MA and a PhD.

 

The Department of East Asian Languages and Literatures (Humanities) has 12 regular faculty members (4 asst, 6 assoc, 2 full).  The department has no affiliated or participating faculty members.  It offers both an MA and a PhD.

 

The Department of Geography (Social Sciences) has 12 regular faculty members (4 asst, 2 assoc, 6 full).  In addition, it has 7 Òspecial staff,Ó and no participating or affiliated faculty.  The department offers both an MA and a PhD.

 

 

 



[1] This is also the model found in the departments at Oregon State University, Washington State University, UC Riverside, and the University of Hawaii.

[2] Excluding AAU Canadian universities (McGill University and University of Toronto).