PORTLAND, November 4 – The State Board of Higher Education (the
“Board) met today at Portland State University, reviewing campus
performance and target-setting reports, among other action and report items
covered by the Board.
Campus Performance Each OUS institution president presented a
brief report on 2005 campus performance results and targets (see http://www.ous.edu/board/meetingmaterials.htm,
11-04 docket, Appendix B for campus-specific reports). The reports provide
current and historical performance results for the seven OUS institutions based
on targeted goals. There are 13 primary performance indicators for the
campuses, and each university sets targets for 5 of those, plus 2
campus-specific indicators. These performance and target-setting reports are
one piece of a larger OUS accountability, monitoring, and planning effort,
which helps to inform policy at both the campus and the Board levels. Each
campus has diverse missions, students, and markets, so it would be misleading
to provide comparative information on these measures; thus the data are
provided on a campus basis, allowing for assessments based on each
institution’s own goals and accomplishments.
Indicators for which each campus sets and tracks targets
include: freshman retention rate; total degrees awarded; degrees in shortage
areas; graduate satisfaction; and research and development expenditures. Other indicators monitored for which no
targets are set include: total credit enrollment; new undergraduate enrollment;
freshman graduation rate; graduate success; students per full-time faculty;
faculty compensation; philanthropy; and internships.
Campus specific targeted indicators are: Eastern Oregon
University tracks regional participation at EOU, and high school outreach;
Oregon Institute of Technology tracks women in engineering fields, and degree
completion rates; Oregon State University tracks high GPA high school
graduates, and student diversity; Portland State University tracks science and
engineering R&D, and community-service learning; Southern Oregon University
tracks transfer student graduation rate, and philanthropy; University of Oregon
tracks faculty compensation, and research and economic development index; and
Western Oregon University tracks transfer student completion, and first-generation
student retention.
Capital Budget Jay Kenton, OUS vice chancellor for finance and
administration, reported that in the 2005 Legislative Session a budget note
directed OUS to identify to the Legislative Emergency Board capital construction
projects for which the Board might seek Article XI-G bond authorization through
2013. The Legislature now expects
the OUS to obtain authorization for any bond proceeds before raising funds for
them. Thus, campuses must present any anticipated capital projects for which
they will seek donations over the next 8 years at the January 2006 meeting of
the Emergency Board. Kenton said that since 1997, the legislature has allowed
gifts and grants to be considered as the required General Fund match for XI-G
bonds. In 2005, as campuses have become more successful in fundraising, the
Board asked the Legislature for higher amounts of bonds than in the past ten
years to complete projects to meet campus growth and renovation needs with
enrollment increases.
After discussing the new requirements outlined in the 2005
Budget Note, the Board approved authorization for the Chancellor or designee to
present to the January 2006 Legislative Emergency Board a report on 2007-2013
capital projects for which the Board may request Article XI-G bond proceeds to
be matched with gift funds, as required by the budget note attached to the
Adopted 2005-2007 OUS Capital Construction Budget.
OUS Research Council Board Directory Kirby Dyess described a
proposal to establish an OUS Research Council which would serve as an advisory
council to the Board on research issues within the System. This body would
promote collaborations in research within OUS and with outside entities. The
Council would also ensure that best practices are utilized in areas such as
research commercialization, publishing, and consulting with industry. Assuring effective tech transfer and
commercialization would also be an important role of the Council. Dyess noted that it is important that
OUS take advantage of opportunities in commercialization, and that these
include OUS regional institutions as well. The Council would reinforce the
important connections between instruction and research. Communicating the
excellence in OUS research in the state and outside, especially the spires of
excellence, would also be an important role of the Council. After discussion, the Board approved
the establishment of the OUS Research Council.
In other actions and discussion at today’s
meeting, the Board and/or Committees:
| Web page spun on 8 November 2005 by Peter B Gilkey 202 Deady Hall, Department of Mathematics at the University of Oregon, Eugene OR 97403-1222, U.S.A. Phone 1-541-346-4717 Email:peter.gilkey.cc.67@aya.yale.edu of Deady Spider Enterprises |