HIST 104: World
History I
Prof. Lisa Wolverton – University of Oregon – Fall 2012
SECTIONS
Discussion sections provide a valuable opportunity to engage with the course themes and readings in a small-group environment. Each week in section, students will discuss issues relevant to the week’s lectures, analyze the reading assignments, discuss or present their written work, and go over recent exams. Regular section meetings are not review sessions, but students should feel free to ask questions, for clarification or further information, about the week’s lectures.
Attendance is mandatory, and participation very important. Moreover, in most weeks, students must turn in written work. Assignments are due in section, at the beginning of class, no exceptions! Absences and missing or late writing assignments will be accepted only with a doctor’s note.
Section accounts for 30% of the student’s final grade. Individual grades will be assigned to written work, and instructors will also keep records of attendance and oral participation. Please note: while each of the writing assignments seems like a minor exercise, they do add up. Consistent high-quality work will contribute to a good final grade in the course overall—as will thoughtful engagement with the material.
Writing Assignments
Week 1: The nature of these writing assignments should make plagiarism a non-issue, but it is nevertheless important to be aware of what constitutes plagiarism and how such an offense will affect your academic standing. Consult the university’s guidelines (at the library or here) and then explain in your own words what plagiarism is. Be sure not to plagiarize the plagiarism guidelines! And please sign your paper at the bottom.
Week 4: Write a one-page description and
analysis of your study habits thus far in the course, including how you
prepared for the first mid-term exam.
You will be graded on the degree of thoughtful, thorough engagement with
the assignment, as well as on clear, correct writing.
Week 5: Compare the Gospel of Thomas to either Paul’s letter to the Romans or to the Lotus Sutra. The substance of your comparison,
including whether to emphasize similarities or differences, is up to you. However, your one-page paper must be
grounded in the details of the texts.
(Remember you are reading only excerpts from these texts, and also that
your analysis should be based on the specific passages excerpted.)
Week 6: Both Tacitus and Procopius describe
Germanic peoples from a Roman perspective, although at very different point in
Europe’s history. Compare
Procopius’s description of the Vandals with Tacitus’s earlier generalizations
about Germanic peoples. Then write
a paper that answers the question:
What do the texts suggest has changed from the Roman side by the time Procopius was
writing? Write a one-page paper
that includes specific examples from the texts to support your conclusion.
Week 7:
Repeat the assignment for Week 4,
focusing instead on any changes you have made in your study habits since then,
your sense of how your performance on the second midterm exam compared to the
first, and your overall grasp of the course as a whole. In conjunction with this one-page
analysis, please also turn in your previous paper for Week 4.
Week 8: What is Marco Polo’s assessment of
Chinese society under Kublai Khan, and how does it compare to his view of the
societies he encounters on the way to China and/or in India? Write a one-page answer to the question
and provide evidence from the text to support your argument.
Week 10: As reported in the Florentine Codex,
what, in the Aztec view, distinguished “civilized” peoples from “barbarians”
among the native inhabitants of Mexico?
As always, write a one-page answer to the question and provide evidence
from the text to support your argument.