The following was received Wednesday 16 December 1998 from Professor NATHAN TUBLITZ  in support of his proposed motion concerning the river front research park. It is posted on the www as per his request. Peter B Gilkey (Senate Webmaster) 

A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE RIVERFRONT RESEARCH PARK AS IT RELATES TO THIS RESOLUTION
 

The areas under discussion are two adjacent parcels on the south side of the Willamette River. One is called the River View Sector, a 10+ acre grassy parcel by Autzen Bridge with the well-used soccer and frisbee fields. The second parcel, called the Gateway Sector, is a 5+ acre parcel immediately to the west of the Riverview Sector and east of the EWEB building. Both parcels fall entirely within the federally-mandated Willamette River Scenic Corridor (Willamette Greenway).
 

The original RRP Master Plan proposed to develop these two sectors with a total of 5-10 buildings, roads, up to 4 parking structures, bark-o-mulch landscaping, paths, and several surface parking lots. Last spring the University administration, which supports the Master Plan, created a RRP Review Committee to evaluate the RRP. The University RRP Review Committee issued a report in October 1998 supporting RRP expansion north of the tracks. They suggested several changes to the original Master Plan, the most significant of which were to begin development of and increase density in the Gateway Sector, to delay development of the River View Sector for 5 years, and to set back the buildings along the river by 100 ft instead of the original 35 ft. On December 2nd the University Senate passed a resolution affirming all 3 of the RRP Review Committee's major conclusions above, thus giving the green light for expansion of the Research Park into the Willamette Greenway.
 

RRP Expansion into either of the two sectors along the Willamette River will irreversibly ruin the scenic beauty and natural vista of this river front area appreciated by thousands of people every day. The University cannot be committed to environmental consciousness on this side of Franklin Boulevard and at the same time destroy a large and beautiful riparian zone across the road. Moreover, to develop either sector would go against the mandate of our citizens and neighbors who overwhelmingly voted in favor of increasing urban green spaces at the last election. It is important to realize that preservation of the Gateway and River View Sectors does not necessarily mean that the RRP park cannot be expanded further; RRP expansion can still be accomplished using existing vacant or underdeveloped parcels south of the railroad tracks.
 

Bottom lines:

1) The University can realize the long-term objectives of the RRP without compromising the natural beauty of the lands alongside the river.
2) A research park can be built anywhere; a river front, once destroyed, is gone forever.


NATHAN TUBLITZ  tublitz@UONEURO.uoregon.edu
Professor of Biology Institute of Neuroscience
University of Oregon Eugene OR 97403
Phone: 1-541-346-4510 FAX: 1-541-346-4548